woman arrested for making faces at dog
Thursday, June 7th, 2007AP - CHELSEA, Vt. - A prosecutor has dropped charges against a woman who was arrested for staring at and making faces at a police dog.
“Prosecuting a woman for ’staring’ at a police dog is absurd,” said her lawyer. “People are allowed to make faces at police dogs and officers to express their disapproval. It’s constitutional expression,” said public defender Kelly Green, who represented Jayna Hutchinson.
Hutchinson, 33, of Lebanon, N.H., was charged with cruelty to a police animal and resisting arrest after a July 31 incident in West Fairlee in which police were called to a market to investigate a report of a brawl. They were approached by Hutchinson, who told one officer she had been assaulted the day before by one of the men involved.
She asked Vermont State Police Sgt. Todd Protzman to take her statement but he refused, telling her she smelled like alcohol and was drunk but that he would take her statement at another time.
After a heated exchange, she approached Protzman’s cruiser, where his dog Max was waiting, putting her face within inches of the window and “staring at him in a taunting/harassing manner,” Protzman wrote in an affidavit.
“While the defendant taunted my canine, Max was focused on the defendant and the perceived threat she presented to him,” the affidavit said. “He was no longer focused on me and the other officers at the scene.”
jay: i love cop talk. ‘my canine’ is really something else. is there something the matter with saying ‘my dog?’ or ‘the animal?’ i don’t think there is. do cops talk that way because they think it sounds both more professional and more hard-ass? also, it’s sad when canines lose focus.
dan: what’s up, my canine? my sister from another litter! my pooch from another cooch!
jay: pooch from another cooch?!
cates: we have irritating policespeak in the uk, too. criminals are always “perpetrators”. people never head north; they always “proceed in a northerly direction”. and the police never lock anyone up; they “deprive them of their liberty”. i’m sure it’s just an attempt to reverse the totally unjustified and widespread opinion that cops are intellectually sub-normal.
jay: pooch from another cooch?!
dan: over the line?


